Michael Saylor Warns Against Relying on Ethereum and Solana: "Risk of Another FTX or Terra Collapse"

Michael Saylor Issues Caution: Ethereum and Solana Could Mirror FTX or Terra Collapse

/

Michael Saylor, Executive Chairman of MicroStrategy and one of the most vocal Bitcoin advocates, has issued a strong warning to the crypto community—highlighting the risks of relying on smart contract platforms such as Ethereum and Solana. In a recent statement, Saylor compared these ecosystems to previous catastrophic failures like FTX and Terra, warning that history could repeat itself if risk management is ignored.

wp:separator /wp:separator

Saylor’s Argument: Trust the Immutable, Not the Experimental

/

Saylor's stance is rooted in a belief that Bitcoin remains the only truly decentralized and secure network, while other platforms carry centralization risks, technical complexity, and regulatory uncertainty.

{"className":""}

According to him:

• Ethereum and Solana rely heavily on evolving codebases and centralized development teams, which could be vulnerable to bugs, exploits, or regulatory pressure.
• Past collapses—such as the downfall of FTX and the Terra
  LUNA ecosystem—were preceded by overconfidence in centralized leadership and poorly tested models.
• Bitcoin, in contrast, has proven resilient, with a predictable monetary policy and unmatched decentralization.

/ wp:video {"id":3329}

/wp:video wp:separator /wp:separator

Why His Warning Matters

/

Saylor’s comments come at a time when Ethereum and Solana are seeing increased adoption—especially with the rise of real-world asset tokenization, DeFi, and NFT infrastructure. However, his warning touches on growing concerns about:

• Smart contract security vulnerabilities
• Centralization of validators and developers
• Regulatory clampdowns on non-Bitcoin assets

/ wp:separator /wp:separator

Is It a Fair Comparison?

/

Some in the crypto space argue that comparing Ethereum or Solana to failed projects like FTX or Terra is exaggerated, given their active development, institutional interest, and functional ecosystems. However, others acknowledge that:

• Decentralization trade-offs are real, especially on high-performance chains.
• Mass adoption without robust governance can lead to systemic risks.
• Over-leveraged ecosystems and speculative behavior were key factors in past collapses—and remain present today.

/ wp:separator /wp:separator

The Bigger Picture: Risk Management in Crypto

/

Regardless of where one stands on the Ethereum vs. Bitcoin debate, Saylor’s warning reinforces a critical truth:
Effective risk management is essential in crypto, especially in a market known for extreme volatility and rapid change.

{"className":""}

Investors, builders, and users alike must remain vigilant—not just about innovation, but about its foundations.